26 Nov 25
The trajectory of U.S. monetary policy and cryptocurrency regulation could shift if Donald Trump secures a second presidential term in 2024. Kevin Hassett, former chair of the Council of Economic Advisers under Trump, has indicated that the campaign is actively considering candidates for Federal Reserve Chair who are supportive of digital assets.
As policymakers and industry leaders debate the future of digital currencies, the stance of the Federal Reserve remains pivotal. According to Hassett, the Trump team recognizes the growing significance of crypto in financial systems and is evaluating potential nominees “who understand and will advocate for cryptocurrencies.”
Hassett emphasized that the administration, if elected, will prioritize a nominee who is “deeply supportive” of crypto. These statements reflect an evolving strategy to address both innovation and regulation in the digital finance landscape.
If Trump were to install a pro-crypto chair at the Fed, it could spur major regulatory and infrastructural developments in the United States’ approach to digital assets. The Federal Reserve’s stance heavily influences the wider financial market’s attitude towards crypto, impacting everything from payment systems to regulatory frameworks.
With crypto-friendly leadership at the helm, supporters argue that the U.S. could foster an environment conducive to blockchain advancement, digital asset adoption, and increased institutional participation. Such a shift may also prompt a reevaluation of banking restrictions that currently limit integration of emerging crypto-based financial products.
However, changes in leadership and policy direction can introduce volatility. Some financial experts caution that rapid deregulation could expose consumers and investors to enhanced risks, especially if oversight fails to keep pace with rapidly evolving technology and market practices.
The comments from Hassett come amid heightened political debate over the proper scope of U.S. crypto regulation. While the Biden administration has approached the sector with caution, emphasizing consumer protection and systemic risk, the Trump campaign appears to position itself as more open to digital asset innovation.
This divergence is reflected in statements and policy priorities, with Republicans often framing the current regulatory climate as overly restrictive. Crypto industry advocates have increasingly voiced support for clear guidelines, seeing a pro-crypto Fed chair as a possible catalyst for more business-friendly regulation.
As an economist with deep experience in monetary policy, Hassett’s endorsement of a pro-crypto nominee signals the mounting influence of digital finance in national economic strategies. He has pointed to the potential for digital currencies to drive future economic growth and innovation, provided the regulatory framework adapts appropriately.
According to Hassett, identifying a Fed nominee who combines central banking expertise with a positive view of cryptocurrencies is a top priority for the Trump team. Industry observers will watch closely for names that emerge, as these will signal the policy direction for the next four years should Trump win in November.
This focus on digital asset advocacy at the highest levels of U.S. monetary policy comes at a time when other jurisdictions, such as the European Union and several Asian countries, have begun implementing comprehensive crypto regulations. The U.S. crypto sector, one of the world’s largest, has been calling for clarity, with concerns that the country could fall behind in blockchain technology leadership if regulatory uncertainty continues.
Trump’s campaign, in signaling support for crypto, may be seeking to appeal to both industry stakeholders and a growing population of digital asset investors. Approximately 20 million Americans are estimated to own cryptocurrencies, making this a potentially important electoral issue.
If the next Presidential term brings a Federal Reserve Chair who supports digital assets, observers anticipate several potential outcomes. These could include a reevaluation of current Fed policies on digital innovation, an openness to central bank digital currencies (CBDC), and closer collaboration with fintech markets.
The prospect of such a leadership change raises key questions: how will the Federal Reserve balance the goal of fostering innovation with its mandate to ensure financial stability and consumer protection? Can a crypto-friendly approach accelerate growth without introducing new systemic vulnerabilities?
Market participants are likely to pay close attention to further statements from Trump’s advisors, as well as party platforms and candidate debates, over the coming months. Regulatory clarity—and any signals of change from the nation’s central bank—will influence both institutional strategies and the wider market’s evolution.
Kevin Hassett’s comments provide one of the clearest indications yet that U.S. crypto policy could pivot sharply if Trump is re-elected. As debate intensifies over digital assets’ place within the financial system, the selection of a Federal Reserve Chair who is sympathetic to crypto could have lasting consequences for regulation, innovation, and market growth.
With a record number of Americans participating in digital finance and the global landscape rapidly changing, the Federal Reserve’s future leadership will be a key determinant of the United States’ role in the evolving world of cryptocurrency.